Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Daniel Werfel is looking to build on the successes the agency has experienced with the first year of supplemental funding provided to the agency by the Inflation Reduction Act.

Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Daniel Werfel is looking to build on the successes the agency has experienced with the first year of supplemental funding provided to the agency by the Inflation Reduction Act.

"I look at yeartwo through the lens of what do we need to do with the next filing season to build on the successes of the previous filing season," Werfel said during an August 15 teleconference with press as he highlighted a couple of key objectives he has for the second year of supplemental funding.

"First of all, we had a really strong filing season," he said. "It could be stronger. We want to achieve the highest level of service we can achieve."

Among the improvements he wants to see are a further reduction in wait times on calls to the IRS; expanding the number of self-service options that taxpayers can engage in when they call so they don’t have to wait to be connected to an agency representatives; and getting more people to sign up for an online account with the agency, as well as improving the online account functionality.

"The idea would be from a service standpoint, the filing features should feel very different than the previous year," he said.

Werfel also wants to see more expansion in the walk-in service centers, including hiring more workers to allow for more Saturday hours to help people who might not be able to get there during the week due to work, as well as utilizing more pop-up walk-in centers to help reach people in more remote areas of the United States.

On the enforcement side, Werfel wants to see the "anemic" audit rates of high-wealth individuals, large corporations and complex partnerships continue to rise.

"We started to see real meaningful results there," he noted. "I want to be able to report to the American people that we’re putting the Inflation Reduction Act to work to create and drive a more equitable tax system that’s returning money to the government’s bottom line."

Werfel also said the IRS will continue with reporting the "dirty dozen" tax scams and will continue to be looking at ways to help taxpayers avoid these scams as well as helping the victims of those scams. He highlighted the recent action of ending nearly all unannounced visits by IRS representatives to homes and businesses as a way that taxpayers are being protected.

"My hope is that in each successive year, we’re putting tools out there that taxpayers are leveraging and saying, ‘this is helpful,’ and are appreciative of the fact that the IRS is functioning better than it did in previous years," Werfel said.

Recapping The First Year

Much of the press call focused on highlighting the successes of the first year, with Werfel highlighting that the agency provided better service, including providing assistance to more than 7 million taxpayers over the phone, an increase of 3 million over the previous tax filing season and increased face-to-face help to more than 500,000 people at the taxpayer assistance centers, a 30 percent increase. Werfel also mentioned the use of call-back technology so taxpayers don’t have to wait on the phone on hold and can receive a call-back without losing their place in the queue to talk to an agency representative.

He reiterated gains in enforcement as well as improvements on the technology side such as highlighting the recent announcement of more forms being able to be filed electronically and improvements to document scanning of tax forms.

Another aspect of the Inflation Reduction Act that was highlighted during the law’s one year anniversary was by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who highlighted the green energy tax provisions at a recent speech in Las Vegas.

She noted a variety of ways the IRA is helping to spur investment in clean energy, including in buildings and in clean vehicles and is helping the nation meet international climate standards.

"The IRA is helping re-shape some of the production that is critical to our clean economy," Yellen said, according to prepared remarks that were published on the Treasury Department website.

She also highlighted that earlier this summer, "Treasury also released proposed guidance that would make it easier for these tax credits to reach a broad range of institutions. We are implementing innovative tools that will enable states, cities, towns, and tax-exempt organizations – like schools and hospitals – to directly access these credits."

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is seeing a "concerning" increase in state and federal payroll tax evasion and workers’ compensation fraud in the U.S. residential and commercial real estate construction industries.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is seeing a "concerning" increase in state and federal payroll tax evasion and workers’ compensation fraud in the U.S. residential and commercial real estate construction industries.

"FinCEN is committed to combating fraud by shedding light on how illicit actors within the construction industry are using shell corporations and other tactics to commit workers’ compensation fraud and avoid payroll taxes," FinCEN Acting Director Himamauli Das said in a statement.

The agency in a FinCEN Notice issued August 15, 2023, highlighted how companies evade payroll taxes. Step one has construction contractors writing checks payable to the shell corporation, which creates the façade that the shell company is performing construction projects. Step two sees the shell company operator deposit cash the checks at a check cashing facility or deposit them into a shell company bank account. Step three sees the shell company return the cash to the construction contractor, minus a fee, for renting the workers’ compensation insurance policy and conducting payroll-related transactions. The final step is the construction contractors using the cash to pay the workers without withholding appropriate payroll-related taxes or paying any workers’ compensation premiums.

The notice also draws attention "a range of red flags to assist financial institutions in detecting, preventing, and reporting suspicions transactions associated with shell companies perpetrating payrolltax evasion and workers’ compensation fraud in the construction industry." Among the 11 red flags highlighted are:

• The customer is a new (i.e., less than two years old) small construction company specializing in one type of construction trade (e.g., framing, drywall, stucco, masonry, etc.) with minimal online presence and has indicators of being a shell company;
• Beneficial owners of the shell company have no known prior involvement with, or in, the construction industry, and the individual opening the account provides a non-U.S. passport as a form of identification;
• A customer receives weekly deposits in their account that exceed normal account activity from several construction contractors involved in multiple construction trades;
• Large volumes of checks for under $1,000 are drawn on the company’s bank account and made payable to separate individuals (i.e., the workers) which are subsequently negotiated for cash by the payee, and
• The company’s bank account has minimal to no tax- or payroll-related payments to the Internal Revenue Service, state and local tax authorities, or a third-party payroll company despite a large volume of deposits from client.

The statement did not provide any statistical data that reflect the rise in payroll tax evasion or workers’ compensation fraud, but said that every year, "state and federal tax authorities lose hundreds of millions of dollars to these schemes, which are perpetrated by illicit actors primarily through banks and check cashers."

The notice also reminds financial institutions’ obligations to file a suspicious activity report if a transaction could be conducted with the intent for fraud or tax evasion, and it provides instructions on how to file the SAR.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md.—National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins is hoping that collections notices from the Internal Revenue Service will resume in the coming months.

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md.—National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins is hoping that collections notices from the Internal Revenue Service will resume in the coming months.

The agency suspended automated collections notices in response to the backlog of unprocessed mail correspondence that resulted from the shutdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic and have yet to resume sending notices out.

Collis said that the agency is developing a plan on how those collections notices will resume and she said it is an important piece of information that taxpayers with balances due need.

Speaking here August 9, 2023, at the IRS Nationwide Tax Forum event, Collins expressed concern that people are saying "hey, the IRS probably forgot about me because it’s been 18 months. And I am concerned that people do not realize that interest and the failure to pay [penalty] is kicking in."

And while she urged IRS to resume collections notices, she also cautioned that it needs to be done in a staggered fashion so that the agency, as well as tax professionals are not simultaneously inundated with calls about these notices all at once, potentially creating another backlog as the agency continues to clear backlog pandemic inventories.

"So what they’re trying to do is stagger them," Collins said. "Have then come out in different timeframes so that all of them don’t hit at the same time, … because if they turn the spigot on, how many phone calls are they going to get that next day? They won’t be able to handle that volume."

Collins said the agency is looking at how to prioritize which notices should be going out first as well as possibly changing the notices to make them more informative for taxpayers.

"So, stay tuned on that," he told attendees. "I don’t think it’ll be tomorrow, but I’m hoping that it’ll be months from now, not two years from now that we turn it back on."

Another area Collins expressed concerns about is the changing of the 1099-K threshold to $600. She said that her office has been in touch with "the Venmos of the world" to try to get them to put systems in place that will help their customers differentiate between personal transactions and business transactions to help ensure that 1099-Ks that will be issued because of the new threshold will accurate.

"I don’t know what’s going to happen between now and January, but the IRS, and our office as well, has been trying to work on this so it’s not as big a problem," she said. "But I am a little concerned because there’s going to be a lot of 1099 cases, potentially."

Collins also offered a "spoiler alert" that the online accounts for tax professionals "will become useful." She suggested it will not be the fully functioning portal she has been calling for, but there will be more functions added to it to make it a useful tool for tax practitioners.

"It will no longer be just a glorified Power of Attorney form, or the ability to file one,” she said. “It will actually have some usefulness. … Stay tuned."

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

Taxpayers, by the 2024 filing season, will be able to digitally submit all correspondence, non-tax forms, and notice responses electronically to the Internal Revenue Service, the agency announced.

Additionally,"by Filing Season 2025, the IRS is committing to digitally process 100 percent of tax and information returns that are submitted by paper, as well as half of all paper correspondence, non-tax forms, and notice responses,"Department of the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said August 2, 2023. "It will also digitalize historical documents that are currently in storage at the IRS."

Taxpayers, by the 2024 filing season, will be able to digitally submit all correspondence, non-tax forms, and notice responses electronically to the Internal Revenue Service, the agency announced.

Additionally,"by Filing Season 2025, the IRS is committing to digitally process 100 percent of tax and information returns that are submitted by paper, as well as half of all paper correspondence, non-tax forms, and notice responses,"Department of the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said August 2, 2023. "It will also digitalize historical documents that are currently in storage at the IRS."

Taxpayers will still have the option of mailing in paper-based correspondence.

Yellen cited the supplemental funding provided by the Inflation Reduction Act to the IRS for giving the agency the ability to transition from "a paper-based agency" to a "digital-first agency."

"This ‘PaperlessProcessing’ initiative is the key that unlocks other customer service improvements," Yellen said. "It will enable taxpayers to see their documents, securely access their data, and save time and money. And it will allow other parts of the IRS to rely on these digital copies to provide faster refunds, reduce errors in tax processing, and delivery a more seamless and responsive customer service experience."

According to a fact sheet issued by the IRS, the agency estimates that "more than 94 percent of individual taxpayers will no longer ever need to send mail to the IRS," and will enable up to 152 million paper documents to be submitted digitally per year.

Additionally, taxpayers will be able to e-file 20 additional tax forms, enabling up to 4 million additional tax forms to be filed digitally each year, including amendments to Forms 940, 941, 941SSPR.

"At least 20 of the most used non-tax forms will be available in digital, mobile-friendly formats that make them easy for taxpayers to complete and submit," the fact sheet continues. "These forms will include a Request for Taxpayer Advocate Service Assistance, making it easier for taxpayers to get the help they need."

The fact sheet also outlines some more targets for the 2025 filing season, including:

• making an additional 150 of the most used non-tax forms available in digital, mobile-friendly formats;
• digitally processing all paper-filed tax and information returns;
• processing at least half of paper-submitted correspondence, with all paper documents – correspondence, non-tax forms, and notice responses – to be processed digitally by Filing Season 2026; and
• digitizing up to 1 billion historical documents.

"When combined with an improved data platform, digitization and data extraction will enable data scientists to implement advanced analytics and pattern recognition methods to pursue cases that can help address the tax [gap], including wealthy individuals and large corporations using complex structures to evade taxes they owe," the fact sheet states.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

An IRS Notice provides a transition rule that generally allows taxpayers to claim the Code Sec. 25C energy efficient home improvement credit for home energy audits conducted in 2023 even if the auditor is not certified. The Notice also describes regulations the IRS intends to propose for qualified home energy audits.

An IRS Notice provides a transition rule that generally allows taxpayers to claim the Code Sec. 25C energy efficient home improvement credit for home energy audits conducted in 2023 even if the auditor is not certified. The Notice also describes regulations the IRS intends to propose for qualified home energy audits.

Taxpayers may rely on the Notice until the proposed regs are issued. The proposed regs are expected to apply to tax years ending after December 31, 2022 .

Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit for Home Energy Audits

The energy efficient home improvement credit is generally equal to 30 percent of amounts paid or incurred for qualified energy efficiency improvements, residential energy property expenditures, and home energy audits placed in service after 2022. The credit is generally limited to $1,200 per year, but different annual limits apply to particular types of expenses.

The annual credit for home energy audits is limited to $150 per year. For example, if a taxpayer pays $900 for a home energy audit, the credit is limited to $150 rather than 30 percent of the expense ($300).

A qualified home energy audit must:

Transition Rule for 2023

A transition rule applies to home energy audits conducted on or before December 31, 2023, during a tax year ending after December 31, 2022. An audit during this transition period may qualify for the credit even if it is not conducted by a certified home energy auditor. However, an audit conducted after December 31, 2023, will not qualify for the credit unless the auditor is certified.

Proposed Regs: Certified Home Energy Auditor

The proposed regs will define a "qualified home energy audit" as an inspection conducted by or under the supervision of a qualified home energy auditor. The audit must be consistent with the Jobs Task Analysis led by the Department of Energy (DOE) and validated by the industry.

A qualified home energy auditor will have to be certified by a Qualified Certification Program at the time of the audit. DOE maintains a list of qualified certified programs on its website at https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/25c-energy-efficient-home-improvement-credit. These are the only programs that may certify a qualified home energy auditor.

Proposed Regs: Written Report

Under the proposed regs, a qualified home energy audit must include a written report prepared and signed by the qualified home energy auditor. The report must include:

Proposed Regs: Substantiation

Finally, the proposed regs will require the taxpayer to substantiate the home energy audit expenditure by maintaining the certified home energy auditor’s signed written report as a tax record. The taxpayer must also comply with the instructions for Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits, or any successor form.

The Internal Revenue Service will end, except in very limited circumstances, the practice of making unannounced visits to taxpayers’ homes and businesses."This change is effective immediately,"IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel said during a July 24, 2023, teleconference with reporters. Werfel said the change is being made in reaction to an increase in scam activity as well as for IRS employee safety."With a growth in scam artists, taxpayers are increasingly uncertain who was knocking on their doors," Werfel said. "For IRS employees, there were fears about their own personal safety on these visits. I also learned that these concerns were shared by our partners as the National Treasury Employees Union."

The Internal Revenue Service will end, except in very limited circumstances, the practice of making unannounced visits to taxpayers’ homes and businesses."This change is effective immediately,"IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel said during a July 24, 2023, teleconference with reporters. Werfel said the change is being made in reaction to an increase in scam activity as well as for IRS employee safety."With a growth in scam artists, taxpayers are increasingly uncertain who was knocking on their doors," Werfel said. "For IRS employees, there were fears about their own personal safety on these visits. I also learned that these concerns were shared by our partners as the National Treasury Employees Union."

Unannounced visits will be replaced with scheduled visits. If the IRS needs to meet with a taxpayer, that taxpayer will receive an appointment letter, known as a 725-B letter, to schedule a time for a revenue officer to meet with the taxpayer."This will help taxpayers feel more prepared when it is time to meet," Werfel said."“Taxpayers whose cases are assigned to a revenue officer will now be able to schedule face-to-face meetings at a set place and time. They will have the necessary information and documents in hand to reach a resolution of their cases more quickly."

In addressing what the IRS will do if a taxpayer is not reachable by mail or is not responding to a meeting scheduling letter, Werfel stated that there are other actions that the agency can take to help drive compliance, such as imposing a lien or a levy, which can be done remotely. He also stressed that in past cases where revenue officers made unannounced visits, they were in situations where the revenue officer was attempting to collect a sizable debt with a median in these cases of $110,000."These homevisits were not occurring for small tax debt," Werfel said. "These are for big tax debts." Werfel outlined what he described as "rare instances" when unannounced visits will continue to occur, including service of a summons and subpoena as well as in the conduct of sensitive enforcement activities such as the seizure of assets."These activities are just a drop in the bucket compared to the number of visits that have taken place in the past," Werfel said, noting that there were a few hundred each year compared to the tens of thousands of other visits that occurred each year under the decades-old policy.

Werfel said that this policy will not impact activities conducted by the Criminal Investigations division, which operates under its own rules and protocols."Today’s decision is part of a broader plan that will help us work smarter and be more efficient," he said, noting this action is part of the larger IRS transformation effort taking place with the help of the supplemental funding provided by the Inflation Reduction Act.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS has released a revenue ruling providing additional guidance concerning receipt of cryptocurrency. If a cash-method taxpayer stakes cryptocurrency native to a proof-of-stake blockchain and receives additional units of cryptocurrency as rewards when validation occurs, the fair market value of the validation rewards received is included in the taxpayer's gross income in the tax year in which the taxpayer gains dominion and control over the validation rewards. The same is true if a taxpayer stakes cryptocurrency native to a proof-of-stake blockchain through a cryptocurrency exchange and receives additional units of cryptocurrency as rewards as a result of the validation

The IRS has released a revenue ruling providing additional guidance concerning receipt of cryptocurrency. If a cash-method taxpayer stakes cryptocurrency native to a proof-of-stake blockchain and receives additional units of cryptocurrency as rewards when validation occurs, the fair market value of the validation rewards received is included in the taxpayer's gross income in the tax year in which the taxpayer gains dominion and control over the validation rewards. The same is true if a taxpayer stakes cryptocurrency native to a proof-of-stake blockchain through a cryptocurrency exchange and receives additional units of cryptocurrency as rewards as a result of the validation

Scenario in the Ruling

The revenue ruling presents a scenario in which transactions in a cryptocurrency that is convertible virtual currency are validated by a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. A cash-method taxpayer validates a new block of transactions on the cryptocurrency blockchain, receiving two units of the cryptocurrency as validation rewards. Pursuant to the cryptocurrency protocol, during a brief period ending on Date 2, the taxpayer lacks the ability to sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of any interest in the two units of cryptocurrency in any manner. On the following day (Date 3), the taxpayer has the ability to sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of the two cryptocurrency units.

Analysis and Holding

Cryptocurrency that is convertible virtual currency is treated as property for Federal income tax purposes and general tax principles applicable to property transactions apply to transactions involving cryptocurrency. For example, a taxpayer who receives cryptocurrency as a payment for goods or services or who mines cryptocurrency must include the fair market value of the cryptocurrency in the taxpayer's gross income in the tax year the taxpayer obtains dominion and control of the cryptocurrency.

In the scenario, two units of cryptocurrency represent the taxpayer's reward for staking units and validating transactions on the blockchain. On Date 3, the taxpayer has an accession to wealth as the taxpayer gains dominion and control through the taxpayer's ability, as of this date, to sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of the two units of cryptocurrency received as validation rewards. Accordingly, the fair market value of the two units of cryptocurrency is included in taxpayer's gross income for the tax year that includes Date 3.

Problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s handling of the Employee Retention Tax Credit took center stage before a House committee hearing, with tax professionals airing issues they have experienced and ongoing concerns they have.

Problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s handling of the Employee Retention Tax Credit took center stage before a House committee hearing, with tax professionals airing issues they have experienced and ongoing concerns they have.

Testifying at a July 28, 2023, hearing of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight, Larry Gray, partner at AGC CPA, said that as the pandemic started and he started to make educational YouTube videos to help other practitioners navigate the tax law, he found issues with the ERTC, including the growing industry of ERTC mills and the potential for fraud that comes with them.

He noted that many of these mills are simply taking their fee for providing essentially clerical assistance. However, Gray noted that in these ERTC mills, the agreements stated that"they don’t do audit," but they might be able to help find someone of a business does get audited because of the ERTC filing. And unfortunately, as was discussed throughout the hearing, people are falling for these ERTC mills and putting their businesses at risk.

And Gray put the problems that have arisen squarely on the IRS.

"We are getting no guidance," Gray said. "There should have been an ERTC implementation team to coordinate from the top down. We need education. We need guidance."

To that end, the IRS did issue a legal advice memorandum on July 20, 2023, that shows the application of the statutory requirements of the ERTC across five different scenarios.

Gray also took a subtle dig at Congress, acknowledging in his testimony that part of the issues could be related to an IRS that was "understaffed, and they were underfunded" when the COVID-19 pandemic began three years ago.

Roger Harris, President of accounting and tax firm Padgett Advisors, also highlighted issues, starting with the first which was "how we submitted claims to the IRS," which was exclusively on paper at a time when no one was present to handle the processing of paper correspondence because of the pandemic, creating a significant backlog.

"And it’s still ongoing," he continued, causing a "delay in getting the money out to the people who need it."

And with all the moving parts related to potential people who need to amend returns depending on how the business is structured, a mistake in any of these forms could be generating penalties and interest, a problem that is magnified when combined with Gray’s observation of the lack of available guidance to help taxpayers who are trying to do the right thing and collect money they are legitimately owed.

Ahead of the subcommittee hearing, the IRS announced in a July 26, 2023, statement that it received more than 2.5 million claims since the ERTC program began and it has "made substantial progress on these claims this year, with 99 percent of claims approximately three-months old as of mid-July."

However, throughout the hearing, witnesses and committee members questioned the integrity of that figure, noting that IRS has changed numbers on its website as to how many claims remain in the backlog. There also were question on how the figure itself is determined.

Harris also pointed out the problems the ERTC mills are causing with his business and for other tax professionals looking to do the right thing by their clients.

"We have had clients that we have dealt with for many years who have trusted our advice," Harris testified. "But all of a sudden when someone is telling them, ‘Your advisor doesn’t know what they are doing, and if you listen to me, I can give you a half million dollars,’ it’s very hard for as the people who are working with these small businesses to win that argument, in many instances, just because of the sheer amount of money that is being dangled in front of them."

Harris continued: "And as we have heard, the IRS has no choice but to begin enforcement actions to try and correct this."

He said he is asking the IRS "for some help [with] a real-world solution to give us the ability to try to bring these people back into compliance. … [It] is going to take a concerted effort by our industry, the tax practitioner community, to help solve this problem," especially when people may have already spent the money because they were unaware that the weren’t entitled to under the ERTC program and fell for the fraud being perpetrated by the ERTC mills. And that does not even account for the fees that were paid to the ERTC mills that will never be recovered.

He did note that IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, at last week’s IRS-sponsored tax forum in Atlanta did ask tax practitioners what they needed in regard to the ERTC.

In its July 26 statement, the IRS offered a series of recommendations on how to avoid ERTC scams. At the tax forum, Werfel said that the "amount of misleading marketing around this credit is staggering, and it is creating an array of problems for taxprofessionals and the IRS while adding risk for businesses improperly claiming the credit. A terrible scenario is unfolding that hurts everyone involved – except the promoters" of the misleading ERTC marketing.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS announced substantial progress in the ongoing effort related to the dubious Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims. The IRS successfully cleared the backlog of valid ERCs. The period of eligibility for the credit for affected businesses is very limited, covering only between March 13, 2020, and December. 31, 2021. Under the current law, businesses can typically continue to file claims for the credit until April 15, 2025.

The IRS announced substantial progress in the ongoing effort related to the dubious Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims. The IRS successfully cleared the backlog of valid ERCs. The period of eligibility for the credit for affected businesses is very limited, covering only between March 13, 2020, and December. 31, 2021. Under the current law, businesses can typically continue to file claims for the credit until April 15, 2025.

"The further we get from the pandemic, we believe the percentage of legitimate claims coming in is declining," IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel told attendees at the IRS Nationwide Tax Forum in Atlanta. "Instead, we continue to see more and more questionable claims coming in following the onslaught of misleading marketing from promoters pushing businesses to apply. To address this, the IRS continues to intensify our compliance work in this area," he added.

Taxpayers should be wary of certain signs including (1) unsolicited calls or advertisements mentioning an easy application process; (2) statements that the promoter or company can determine ERC eligibility within minutes; and (3) large upfront fees to claim the credit. Eligible employers who need help claiming the credit should work with a trusted tax professional. Finally, taxpayers can report ERC abuse by submitting Form 14242, Report Suspected Abusive Tax Promotions or Preparers and any supporting materials to the IRS Lead Development Center in the Office of Promoter Investigations.

The Internal Revenue Service is looking for ways get its post-filing alternative dispute resolution programs greater exposure and use.

The agency recently issued a public call for comment on a variety of topics related to the use of ADR, including learning why taxpayers choose not to use ADR; issues that keep taxpayers from using ADR that should be changed to allow for inclusion; how best to improve ADR; how best to education about ADR; feedback on when ADR proved particularly useful; and ideas on how to achieve tax certainty or resolution sooner beyond existing ADR programs, including ideas for new programs.

The Internal Revenue Service is looking for ways get its post-filing alternative dispute resolution programs greater exposure and use.

The agency recently issued a public call for comment on a variety of topics related to the use of ADR, including learning why taxpayers choose not to use ADR; issues that keep taxpayers from using ADR that should be changed to allow for inclusion; how best to improve ADR; how best to education about ADR; feedback on when ADR proved particularly useful; and ideas on how to achieve tax certainty or resolution sooner beyond existing ADR programs, including ideas for new programs.

A list of specific issues the IRS has outlined can be found here, though comments submitted about the ADR should not necessarily be limited to the subject areas listed.

Indu Subbiah, supervisory appeals officer and acting senior advisor in the IRS Independent Office of Appeal, explained the genesis of this request for comment.

"We had a sense the ADR [programs] weren’t being used quite as robustly as we would have liked,” she said in an interview with Federal Tax Daily, adding that a recently issued U.S. Government Accountability Office report “really brought that to our attention."

According to the report, “IRS Could Better Manage Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs To Maximize Benefits,"IRS Could Better Manage Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs To Maximize Benefits," GAO found that while the agency offers six alternative dispute resolution programs,"IRS used ADR programs to resolve disputes in less than half of one percent of all cases reviews by its Independent Office of Appeals"from fiscal year 2013 to 2022. In this time period, the number of cases closed using ADR annually peaked in 2014 (429 cases closed) and then steadily declined during the review period, reaching a low point of 119 cases closed in 2022.

"Beyond these data on ADR usage, IRS does not have the data necessary to manage the ADR programs, such as data on taxpayer requests to use ADR; IRS’ acceptance or rejection of those requests; and the results from using ADR, including rate of resolution, time, and costs," the GAO report states. "Although IRS does not know definitively why ADR usage has declined, potential reasons include taxpayers do not perceive the benefits of using ADR, according to IRS officials"

The report continues: "IRS is missing opportunities to use several management practices for its ADR programs to help increase taxpayers’ willingness to use ADR as well as maximize the programs’ benefits. IRS does not have clear and measurable objectives for its ADR programs that contribute to achieving IRS’s strategic goals and objectives, such as its ability to resolve disputes over specific tax issues and reduce the investment of time and money to do so. IRS does not analyze data to assess whether ADR is achieving benefits. … IRS has not regularly monitored the taxpayer experience with ADR to address problems in real-time."

With these critical observations about the ADR programs being put forth by GAO, the Independent Office of Appeals is now proactively looking at what is going on to make the ADR programs work better for taxpayers and the agency, the first step being this request for comments.

"The whole point of ADR programs is so that taxpayers and the IRS can use ADR to resolve issues, potentially at a lower cost," Subbiah said. "I think everybody would agree that when the process works, the IRS and the taxpayer can avoid costly litigation."

"The question for us is how can we is how can we even improve the ability to resolve a case with Appeals, and to me, it’s maybe can we resolve those cases sooner," Andrew Keyso, chief of the IRS Office of Independent Appeals, said during the interview.

"I think this is a good time to reconsider how we do alternative dispute resolution and mediation because of the" supplemental funding the agency received as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, Keyso said, noting that there are more resources to apply to appeals officers and mediators.

Keyso said that one of the ways the Office of Appeals measures success of ADR "based on how many people are coming in to use ADR and those numbers are fairly small. So I think we’d like to see those numbers increase."

One thing that the IRS will be looking for in the questions is the need for education as a potential way to increase the use of ADR. In fact, one of the questions the agency asked is directly focused on education.

"One of the questions we really focused on was education," Subbiah said, noting that they are looking for stakeholders to "tell us [and] to help us understand whether it is [lack of] education [on ADR and its benefits] or is it something else. I think it will be very telling and very interesting to us to really get at the heart of why it isn’t being used."

Elizabeth Askey, deputy chief of the Office of Independent Appeals, noted, anecdotally, that larger businesses and wealthier taxpayers seem to be a lot more aware of the various tools at their disposal, including ADR. However, the Office also is hearing situations where there is a reluctance on the part of compliance officers to use ADR tools.

Keyso added that while larger businesses and wealthier taxpayers might be more aware of ADR, there needs to be more education for smaller businesses and lower income taxpayers, in addition to education across the IRS itself.

"So, in those cases, it may be a matter of us getting to the root of why some compliance personnel are less inclined to go this route than others," Askey said during the interview. "It’s not just the education of taxpayers and their practitioners, but of our own compliance personnel."

Keyso stressed that this effort was broad, not only in the scope of which taxpayers and practitioners might need education about the availability and use of ADR, but also within the agency. And he remains optimistic that this effort to request commentary from the public will help that.

"We’re optimistic that the public will come in and tell us why we don’t make use of more ADR. We don’t find it productive, for instance, or we can’t get the agency to cooperate," he said. And with the additional IRA funding in hand, the agency can respond and look to see how ADR can be restructured to make it more useful for everyone to help get more issues resolved in a more timely and cost-efficient manner.

"I hope that mindset is shared across the agency," Keyso said."I think it is and is becoming more so in the effort to help resolve cases quickly." He noted there will always be cases where resolution needs a more traditional path, but when this process is complete, there will be a greater recognition where ADR can be and is used.

IRS is asking the public to submit its comments on the ADR programs by August 25, 2023, via email at ap.adr.programs@irs.gov.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins is reiterating her call for the Internal Revenue Service to stop automatically assessing penalties related to international information returns.

National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins is reiterating her call for the Internal Revenue Service to stop automatically assessing penalties related to international information returns.

In an August 22, 2023, blog post, she also called on the agency to "provide taxpayers due process by affording them the opportunity to administratively present their reasonable cause defense and request FTA [first time abatement] and consideration by the Independent Office of Appeals prior to any assessment."

The blog post noted that relief was needed because there is "a misconception that IIRpenalties affect primarily bad-faith, wealthy taxpayers who are experiencing consequences of their own making."

However, that is not the case. Collins wrote that the automatic penalty regime "disproportionately affects individuals and businesses of more moderate resources, and is by no means just a rich person’s problem. Wealthy individuals and large businesses tend to have knowledgeable and well-informed representation and as a result have fewer foot faults. Immigrants, small businesses, and low-income individuals may not be as well-informed about IIRpenalties and may not have return preparers with the same technical expertise on international penalties."

NTA noted that from 2018-2021, 71 percent of the penalties were assessed to taxpayers with incomes of $400,000 or less, with an average penalty to these people being more than $40,000.

One example of how penalties can be triggered is when an immigrant who is a U.S. citizen starts a small business and includes family members who live abroad. This arrangement could trigger the need for an IIR and if it is not filed, the taxpayer could be automatically assessed penalties, which are defined in Internal Revenue Code Sec. 6038 and 6038A. The blog goes through a number of other scenarios which would require an IIR and penalties for failure to do so.

However, when "taxpayers voluntarily correct their failure to file, this good-faith action can sometimes have the unexpected effect of causing the IRS to automatically assess the penalty,"the blog states. "If the IRS does not administratively abate the penalty, taxpayers will need to pay the penalty in full before challenging by filing suit refund in the United States District Court or the United States Court of Federal Appeals."

Collins continues to advocate for legislative changes that would allow for changes in due process that would allow for cases to be heard in court before any penalties are paid, as well as providing a more "efficient and equitable regime governing the initial imposition of IIRpenalties and the mechanisms by which they can be challenged by taxpayers while also protecting their rights."

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

During the presidential campaign, then candidate Barack Obama promised to close international tax loopholes and crack down on offshore tax evasion. In May, President Obama unveiled sweeping measures to reform the nation's international tax rules. The president also proposed to overhaul the rules for holding funds in offshore accounts, repeal the last-in, first-out (LIFO) accounting rules, tax carried interest as ordinary income, and provide limited business tax relief. Details of the president's proposals were released by the Treasury Department in the "Green Book" (named for the color of its cover).

International taxation

A U.S. based company is generally allowed to defer U.S. taxation on its foreign source income until the earnings are repatriated. President Obama has proposed various measures to limit the ability of U.S. companies to take deductions for offshore expenses against U.S. income. According to the president, some companies abuse the deferral rules and his proposals will close loopholes.  Opponents counter that the deferral rules are necessary to ensure American competitiveness in the global economy.

The president also proposed t

• Require corporation status under check-the-box election for certain overseas "disregarded entities" established by U.S. businesses;
• Curb income shifting through intangible property transfers;
• Curb earnings-stripping by expatriated entities through interest deductions;
• Repeal the 80/20 company rules that shelter dividends as foreign-source income;
• Prevent withholding avoidance by foreign portfolio investors through equity swaps; and
• Modify the foreign tax credit rules for dual capacity taxpayers.

Many of the details of these international proposals, especially about how to calculate the amount of deferred deductions to match foreign expenses with deferred income, need to be fleshed out. The president's proposals serve as a blueprint for Congress to use when drafting legislation. Congress may approve all or some of the proposals or make significant changes to them.

Offshore accounts

The IRS is aware that some Americans fail to report all or part of their assets in foreign bank accounts. Estimates of unreported income reach as high as $100 billion. President Obama would strengthen the rules for reporting by Americans and disclosure by foreign banks. Individuals and banks that fail to follow the heightened rules would be subject to enhanced sanctions.

LIFO

Many businesses use LIFO to account for inventory. The last units of inventory purchased are generally treated as the first units sold. The president has proposed to repeal LIFO, which would raise more than $65 billion in revenue.

Carried interest

Under current law, carried interest (partnership profits interests allocable to the performance of services) is taxed as capital gains. President Obama is asking Congress to tax carried interest as ordinary income subject to self-employment tax. Similar measures have failed in Congress before but the need to raise revenue may convince lawmakers to change the tax treatment of carried interest this time.

Business incentives

President Obama has proposed about $70 billion in tax cuts for businesses. One of the most significant incentives would be a permanent research tax credit. A temporary tax break for qualified small business stock would also be extended and expanded.

The president also called on Congress to extend the carryback period for net operating losses (NOLs). Current law allows an extended period for NOLs but is limited to small businesses. President Obama did not specify to what extent he would extend the NOL carryback but is recommending that Congress set aside significant budget resources of over $60 billion between 2009 and 2010 to carry this off.

Additionally, the president has proposed extending a number of temporary business tax incentives. These include tax breaks for restaurants, incentives to produce biodiesel and renewable diesel fuels, and tax credits for investing in economically-challenged neighborhoods. Congress could tack-on more temporary incentives.

All of the president's proposals will be debated at length in Congress over the next several months. The White House is asking Congress to move quickly on international reform and other measures to boost federal revenues. Our office will keep you posted of developments. Please contact us if you have any questions.

Just over 100 days into his administration, President Barack Obama is releasing more details about his tax policies. The Treasury Department's recently published "Green Book" (which is called green for the color of its cover) describes the president's tax proposals. As expected, many of the proposals build on the president's campaign promises to cut taxes for middle-income individuals. Congress has already begun drafting legislation and debating the president's proposals, which could be enacted into law later this year.

Making Work Pay credit

The centerpiece of President Obama's individual tax incentives is the Making Work Pay credit. Many individuals are already receiving the benefit of this credit in their paychecks. The credit reaches $400 for single taxpayers and $800 for married couples filing joint returns if they fall below certain income limits. The credit, however, is temporary and will expire after 2010. President Obama is asking Congress to make the credit permanent but many in Congress worry that a permanent credit would be too expensive.

More middle-income Incentives

Several other incentives are also targeted to middle-income taxpayers. These include marriage penalty relief, a permanent American opportunity education tax credit and permanent extension of lower individual marginal income tax rates (except for the 36 and 39.6 percent rates).  The president has also proposed extending the state and local sales tax deduction, the higher education tuition deduction, the teacher's classroom expense deduction, the saver's credit, and the deduction for charitable contributions of IRA funds. These proposals enjoy significant support in Congress and are expected to pass.

President Obama did not propose extending several new tax breaks. These include the first-time homebuyer credit, which sunsets after December 1, 2009, and the deduction for state and local taxes paid on motor vehicles, which expires after December 31, 2009. The first-time homebuyer is popular in Congress and lawmakers may extend it one or two more years, especially if home sales remain slow.

Higher-income taxpayers

More controversial are the president's proposals for higher income individuals. As mentioned, the top two individual marginal income tax rates would revert to 36 and 39.6 percent after 2010. President Obama has also proposed reinstating and expanding limitations on itemized deductions for higher-income individuals along with reinstating the personal exemption phaseout for higher-income individuals.

The White House generally defines higher-income taxpayers as individuals with incomes above $200,000 and families with incomes above $250,000. It is unclear if these amounts refer to taxable income or adjusted gross income. More details are expected to be released when legislation is introduced in Congress.

Children

One of the most popular federal tax incentives is the child tax credit. The 2009 Recovery Act expanded the credit. President Obama has proposed making the enhanced child tax credit permanent.

The president has also recommended a permanent enhanced earned income tax credit (EITC). Under current law, more families are eligible for the EITC.  However, the president has proposed eliminating the advanced EITC, which provides the credit in advance through payroll.

Capital gains

Under current law, the maximum tax rate on qualified capital gains and dividends is 15 percent. Some taxpayers may be eligible for a zero percent rate. These rates are temporary and will expire after 2010. President Obama has asked Congress to extend the lower rates for middle-income taxpayers. However, higher income individuals would be taxed at 20 percent on qualified dividends and capital gains under the president's plan.

Health care

Congress has just started debating comprehensive health care reform. Lawmakers are looking for ways to fund health care reform. Under current law, the amount that an employer contributes to an employee's health coverage is generally excluded from the employee's taxable income. One idea being floated in Congress is to cap the tax exclusion for employment-based health care coverage.  Administration officials have generally indicated their support for continuing the exclusion.

Retirement savings

During the campaign, then-candidate Obama often spoke about strengthening retirement savings, especially 401(k)s and similar defined contribution arrangements. The president has made one official proposal: mandatory automatic enrollment in IRAs. Generally, employers without a retirement plan would be required to offer automatic enrollment in an IRA to all employees on a payroll-deduction basis. White House officials have also discussed some "unofficial" proposals, such as the partial annuitization of 401(k)s, to strengthen retirement savings.

Estate tax

Eight years ago, Congress voted to repeal the federal estate tax for 2010. At that time, many observers predicted that repeal would be permanent. The recession has brought about different thinking. Instead of repealing the estate tax, the president has proposed extending the current rate of estate tax and exemption amount into 2010.

Congress has a lot of tax legislation on its agenda and is expected to enact much of it into law in late summer or early fall, maybe sooner. Our office will keep you posted of developments and please contact us if you have any questions.

Non-itemizers and itemizers alike who purchase a new vehicle in 2009 may be eligible for a new (but temporary) above-the-line deduction for the state and local sales taxes or excise taxes paid on the purchase. This temporary tax break is part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act).

General rules

The motor vehicle sales tax deduction is treated as an increase in the standard deduction (or as a "bonus" standard deduction for those taking itemized deductions). The deduction for state sales and excise taxes paid on a new motor vehicle is allowed for purchases made between February 17, 2009 and before January 1, 2010. The amount of the deduction allowable cannot exceed the part of the state sales or excise tax imposed on the first $49,500 of the vehicle's purchase price. Eligible taxpayers may claim the deduction in determining their regular income tax and alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability.

Traditionally, one reason to sell your trade-in vehicle to the dealer from whom you are purchasing your new one is that state sales tax laws generally allow sales tax to be paid only on the net purchase price (that is, less the trade-in). While it remains more advantageous to avoid sales tax rather than take a deduction for it, this difference may be one more reason to donate your trade-in to charity. We can crunch the numbers to help you make a final decision.

However, the deduction begins to phase out for individuals with adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeding $125,000 ($250,000 for joint filers) and is completely phased out when an individual's AGI exceeds $135,000 ($260,000 for joint filers). Additionally, the deduction can not be claimed for sales taxes paid on leased vehicles.

Vehicle limits

The deduction is only allowed for "qualified motor vehicles." For purposes of the deduction, a "qualified motor vehicle" is any newly purchased vehicle, including cars, SUVs, light trucks, or motorcycles that are first used by the taxpayer. Used cars are not eligible for the deduction. But, both domestic and foreign-made vehicles qualify. Generally, the qualifying vehicles cannot weigh more than 8,500 gross pounds.

Example. You have purchased a new car that qualifies for the vehicle sales tax deduction. Your AGI is less than $125,000, so you qualify for the full amount of the deduction. The car cost $40,000 and the sales tax paid was 4 percent. Your above-the-line deduction would be $1,600, which if you are in the 25 percent income tax bracket is $400 more in your pocket because of your vehicle purchase.

Move over hybrids - buyers of Volkswagen and Mercedes diesel vehicles now qualify for the valuable alternative motor vehicle tax credit. Previously, the credit had gone only to hybrid vehicles. Now, the IRS has qualified certain VW and Mercedes diesels as "clean" as a hybrid.

Qualifying vehicles

The IRS has designated the following diesel-powered vehicles as advanced lean-burning technology motor vehicles that qualify for the alternative motor vehicle tax credit:

• The 2009 VW Jetta TDI sedan and TDI sportwagen models; and
• The 2009 Mercedes-Benz GL320, R320 and ML320 Bluetec models.

 The credit amounts vary depending on the vehicle's fuel economy. The credit amounts for each vehicle are as follows:

• 2009 VW Jetta TDI sedan and TDI sportwagen: $1,300 credit;
• 2009 Mercedes ML320 Bluetec: $900;
• 2009 Mercedes R320 Bluetec: $1,550; and
• 2009 GL320 Bluetec: $1,800.

VW's diesels went on sale in August, while the Mercedes Bluetec models are expected to go on sale beginning this October.

The alternative motor vehicle tax credit, generally

The alternative motor vehicle tax credit is a lucrative tax credit for purchasers of qualifying automobiles. But, just as the situation is with hybrids, the full amount of the credit for each vehicle is available only during a limited period. The dollar value of the tax credit will begin to be reduced once the manufacturer sells 60,000 vehicles that qualify for the tax credit. Additionally, the credit is available only to the original purchaser of a new, qualifying vehicle. As such individuals who lease the vehicle are not eligible for the credit - the credit is allowed only to the vehicle's owner, such as the leasing company.

Taxpayers may claim the full amount of the allowable credit up to the end of the first calendar quarter after the quarter in which the manufacturer records its sale of the 60,000th advance lean burn technology motor vehicle or hybrid passenger automobile or light truck. For the second and third calendar quarters after the quarter in which the 60,000th vehicle is sold, taxpayers may claim 50 percent of the credit. For the fourth and fifth calendar quarters, taxpayers may claim 25 percent of the credit. No credit is allowed after the fifth quarter.

The credit - as Congress has allotted so far - may only be taken for qualified vehicles purchased before the end of 2010.

Education continues to become increasingly expensive. The Tax Code provides a variety of significant tax breaks to help pay for the rising costs of education, from elementary and secondary school to college. Some people are surprised at what is available these days, as the dust settles on tax rules that have been in transition now for a number of years. A good place to start educating yourself on these education-related tax incentives - to help yourself or a member of your family better tackle the rising expense of education - is right here.

Education continues to become increasingly expensive. The Tax Code provides a variety of significant tax breaks to help pay for the rising costs of education, from elementary and secondary school to college. Some people are surprised at what is available these days, as the dust settles on tax rules that have been in transition now for a number of years. A good place to start educating yourself on these education-related tax incentives - to help yourself or a member of your family better tackle the rising expense of education - is right here.

Hope scholarship and Lifetime Learning credits

The Hope (temporarily enhanced and renamed the "American Opportunity Tax Credit" for 2009 and 2010 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) and Lifetime Learning credits can be claimed for qualified tuition and fees paid by an individual for his or her (or a spouse's or dependent's) enrollment or attendance at any college, university, vocational school or postgraduate school. The American Opportunity Tax Credit, just like the Hope credit, and Lifetime Learning credit can not both be taken for the same student in the same year.

If you pay the qualified education expenses of more than one student in the same year, however, you can choose to take the credits on a per-student for that year. Expenses that do not count towards the Lifetime Learning credit are those incurred to purchase books, supplies and other equipment, and charges and fees associated with meals and lodging. However, the American Opportunity Tax Credit can be claimed for course materials for 2009 and 2010 only.

Moreover, the American Opportunity Tax Credit (unlike the Hope credit) is available for expenses incurred during all four years of college, as provided under the 2009 Recovery Act. The Hope credit is only available for the first two years of college). However, the Lifetime Learning credit can be claimed for all years of postsecondary school (as well as for courses to acquire or improve job skills). In effect, the Lifetime Learning credit can pick up where the Hope credit left off.

The maximum American Opportunity Credit that can be claimed in 2009 and 2010 is $2,500 (previously $1,800 under the Hope credit) of qualified education expenses per student. Under the new credit, the maximum $2,500 per year would be allowed on $4,000 in qualifying payments (100 percent of the first $2,000 and 25 percent of the next $2,000).

For 2009 and 2010, the American Opportunity Tax Credit begins to phase-out when modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) reaches $80,000 for individuals (and $160,00 for joint filers). For 2009, the amount of the Lifetime learning credit phases out for individuals when MAGI reaches $50,000 for individuals and $100,00 for joint filers.

Coverdell Education Savings accounts

Individuals can contribute up to $2,000 a year to a Coverdell Education Savings account, which is established to help pay for the costs of education of an account beneficiary. A beneficiary is someone who is under age 18 or with special needs.

Although contributions to a Coverdell account are not deductible, earnings grow tax-free, and distributions are also tax free if used for qualified education expenses, including tuition and fees, required books, supplies and equipment, as well as qualified expenses for room and board. The account can help pay for the costs of attending an elementary or secondary school, whether public, private or religious, as well as a college or university.

As with the education credits, there are contribution limits based on the taxpayer/contributor's modified AGI.  

Student loan interest

Eligible individuals can take an above-the-line deduction for up to $2,500 of interest paid on student loans used to pay for the cost of attending any college, university, vocational school, or graduate school. A student loan, for purposes of the deduction, is a loan you took out and is designated solely to pay your (or your spouse's or dependent's) qualified education expenses. For example, if you take out a home equity loan to pay for college tuition, the interest may be deductible as mortgage interest, but it is not considered above-the-line interest for a student loan since the lender did not specifically restrict the proceeds to education expenses.

Good news on student loan interest, however, is that qualified education expenses in this case include not only tuition and fees, but also room and board, books, supplies and equipment, and other necessary expenses such as transportation. Interest paid on a loan that is made to you by a related person, such as parents or grandparents, or from a qualified employer plan do not qualify for the deduction.

The deduction is available regardless of whether or not you itemize. For 2009, the amount of the deduction begins to phase out when an individual's modified AGI exceeds $60,000 a year (or $120,000 for married couples filing jointly). The deduction is completely eliminated once an individual's modified AGI reaches $75,000 (or $150,000 for joint filers). For all other taxpayers, the deduction phases out when AGI reaches $60,000 (and is eliminated completely at AGI of $75,000). If you are claimed as a dependent on another's tax return, you can not take the deduction, however.

IRA and 401(k) withdrawals for education expenses

Generally, if you take a distribution from your IRA before you reach age 59 1/2, you must pay a 10 percent additional tax on the early distribution, as well as income tax on the amount distributed. This applies to any IRA you own, whether it is a traditional IRA, a Roth IRA or a SIMPLE IRA. However, you can take a distribution from your IRA before you reach age 59 1/2 and not be subject to the 10 percent additional tax, if the distribution is used to pay the qualified education expenses for:

• Yourself;
• Your spouse; or
• Your or your spouse's child, grandchild or foster child.

Qualified education expenses include tuition, fees, books, supplies, and equipment required for enrollment or attendance at any college, university, vocational school or other post-secondary educational institution. In addition, if the student is at least a part-time student, room and board are generally qualified education expenses, subject to certain limitation.

If you have a 401(k) plan that allows "hardship withdrawals" to be taken to pay for certain higher education expenses, such as tuition and other education expenses, you may consider taking such a distribution to pay for the education expenses for yourself, or your spouse or your children.  

Section 529 college savings plans

An often touted way to pay for college is through a state college savings plan (aka Section 529 plans, or qualified tuition plans). Section 529 plans allow you to save money, tax-free, to pay for qualified education expenses for college. Although contributions are not deductible for federal tax purposes, many states allow residents to deduct contributions on their state return. Moreover, distributions from a 529 plan are tax-free unless the amount distributed is greater than the account beneficiary's adjusted qualified education expenses. Qualified education expenses include amounts paid for tuition, fees, books, supplies and equipment, as well as reasonable costs of room and board for individuals are at least part-time students.

For 2009 and 2010, beneficiaries of qualified tuition plans can use tax-free distributions to pay for computers and computer technology, including internet access. This is courtesy of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Special needs education

The cost for a mentally or physically handicapped individual to attend a special school may be deductible as a medical expense if the principal reason for the individual attending the school is to help overcome or alleviate his or her disability. To qualify for the deduction, the individual does not have to attend a "special school." According to the IRS, the costs of a special education program at any school may be deductible if the program is primarily targeted to the individual's disability. Other deductible medical expenses may include the costs of transportation for the special education, summer school, tutoring, and meals and lodging at the school.

However, remember that medical expenses are only deductible to the extent they exceed 7.5 percent of your income, as an itemized deduction. Individuals with special needs children might also consider Coverdell Education Savings accounts as a vehicle for saving and paying for their children's special education expenses.

Private secondary and nursery school expenses

Private secondary expenses are generally not deductible. Furthermore, the IRS has ruled that any expenses allocated to high school tuition related to advance-placement college credit courses are still considered secondary tuition expenses and will not be counted toward the Hope or Lifetime learning credits.

"After-school" or "extended-day" programs, however, may be deductible if taken toward the child and dependent care credit for a child under age 13 to enable both spouses to work.  Expenses incurred to send a child to nursery school, pre-school or similar programs for children below the kindergarten level qualify fully for the child and dependent care credit without any requirement to separate by time or otherwise the educational portion of the expenses from the child care expenses.

The child and dependent care tax credit is a popular credit that, in part, enables you and your spouse (if married) to reduce your taxes by the cost of certain qualifying expenses you incur to have someone care for your child or childrenwho are under the age of 13 so that you can work or look for work. For 2009, you can generally claim up to $3,000 of expenses paid in the year for one qualifying individual, or $6,000 for two or more qualifying individuals, under the dependent and child care credit. Additional income and eligibility limitations apply.

If you have any questions on how these rules apply to your education expenses, please do not hesitate to call our offices.

The flagging state of the economy has left many individuals and families to cope with rising gas prices and food costs, struggle with their mortgage and rent payments, and manage credit card debt and other common monthly bills. Whether individuals are contemplating how to pay off their credit card or obtain a mortgage amid the "credit crunch" and "economic downturn," many people may be considering alternative sources of financing to reach their goals, including the tapping of a retirement account.

You can generally withdraw funds from your 401(k) three ways: through regular distributions, hardship withdrawals or plan loans. Many employers have adopted 401(k) plan provisions that allow employees to borrow money from their retirement account. Although borrowing from your 401(k) may be an option, there are several important considerations you should take into account before tapping your retirement fund.

The basics of borrowing from your 401(k) plan

The amount that you can borrow from a 401(k) plan is limited to 50 percent of the value of your vested benefit or $50,000, whichever amount is less. However, you can take a loan up to $10,000 even if it is more than one-half of the present value of your vested accrued benefit. Interest on a 401(k) plan loan is not deductible. Despite withdrawing funds from your 401(k) through a plan loan, you will remain vested in your account, subject to your obligation to repay the loan.

If certain requirements are not met, a loan from your 401(k) plan will be treated as a premature distribution for tax purposes, subjecting you to current income tax at ordinary rates plus a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty on the amount distributed, certain requirements must be met. You must repay a loan from your 401(k) within five years, subject to only one exception for a loan used to make a first-time home purchase (a principal residence, not a vacation or secondary home). This "residence exception" allows for a loan term as long as 30 years.

Loan repayments must be made at least every quarter, and are generally automatically deducted from your paycheck. If you are unable to repay the loan and default, the IRS treats the outstanding loan balance as a premature distribution from your 401(k), subject to income tax and the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty. Additionally, most plan terms require that you repay the loan within 60 days if you leave or lose your job.

Drawbacks to borrowing from your 401(k)

Before you dip into your 401(k), you need to be aware of the many disadvantages to taking money from your retirement savings. First, and foremost, many plans contain provisions that prohibit you, and your employer, from making contributions to your 401(k) until you repay the loan or for up to 12 months after the distribution. This is a critical disadvantage to borrowing money from your 401(k) because you are not saving for retirement during the time you are repaying the loan, which may take up to five years, or for the year in which contributions are prohibited. This not only means that you are not saving for retirement for a substantial period, you are also not earning a return on the money you could have contributed albeit for the suspension.

It is imperative that you consider the effects of suspended contributions and the lost earnings and tax-free compounding you could have earned on the money you borrowed from your 401(k). And, as previously discussed, if you default and are unable to pay the loan balance, the outstanding amount is treated by the IRS as a premature distribution and subject to income tax at your ordinary tax rate as well as a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty. Additionally, the maximum contribution you will be allowed to make in the year following the suspension will be reduced by the amount contributed in the prior year.

Another point to consider: the money you borrow will only earn the interest you pay on the loan. Typically, on a 401(k) plan loan, administrators use an interest rate of one to two percentage points above prime interest rates. While paying a lower interest rate to yourself may be more favorable then paying a higher interest rate to a bank, you aren't necessarily earning money, especially considering that the interest you pay on the loan could be significantly lower than the potential earnings you could be making if the money remained in your account.

Potential double taxation

In fact, the interest you pay on the loan is money taken from your paycheck, after-taxes. While it is not an additional cost you'd be paying to a bank, but paying yourself, it is money you may essentially be paying tax on twice. That is because the money you pay yourself interest with is taxed in your paycheck currently, then later when it is distributed to you from the plan in retirement as ordinary income.

Often, individuals end up with an unexpected tax liability on April 15. There are several options available to pay off your tax debt, stop accruing penalties and interest and secure peace of mind. Each payment method has its advantages and disadvantages depending on your financial, and personal, circumstances, and each option should be discussed with a tax professional prior to making a decision. Our office would be glad to answer any questions you have about each payment method.  

Stop accruing interest and penalties

Remember, if you filed on time but were unable to pay the entire amount, or any amount, showing as due on your return when you filed, and you have an outstanding balance with Uncle Sam, you are incurring interest and a "failure to pay" penalty imposed by the IRS. The failure to pay penalty is one-half of one percent (0.5%) owed for each month, or part of a month, that your tax remains unpaid after the due date. The late payment penalty can climb to a maximum of 25 percent on the amount actually shown as due on the return, even if you paid some of the tax debt off when you filed your return. This is the reason why it is imperative that you pay off your tax debt as quickly as possible, under a plan that avoids this steep penalty.

Here are some of the most common payment options available to taxpayers who still have an outstanding balance with the IRS:

Pay by credit card. Depending on your situation, paying the balance of your tax liability with a credit card (or by another form of personal loan) may be the best option in order to stop accruing interest and penalties for failing to pay the entire amount due. If this is an option, make sure you use a card with the lowest interest rate and the lowest account balance. The IRS has contracted with two private, third-party servicers that process credit card tax payments, and both (Official Payments Corporation and Link2Gov Corporation) accept most major credit cards such as American Express, Visa, and MasterCard. Additionally, you can use a credit card regardless of whether you filed your return electronically or by mail. Finally, be mindful that interest on a credit card or other personal loan to pay off your taxes is non-deductible.

Apply for an installment plan. The IRS offers taxpayers the ability to apply for an installment agreement plan. There are many requirements and rules regarding the installment plan method, which a tax professional can discuss with you. A request for an installment plan is made by filing Form 9465 with the IRS. Although there is a fee for apply for the agreement of approximately $105, this amount is deducted from your first payment upon approval of your request. However, even if your request is granted, you will continue to be charged interest on any tax not paid by the due date. But, the late payment penalty will generally be half the usual rate (i.e. 2 percent, instead of 4 percent per month).

Offer in compromise. In some situations, the IRS may allow you to strike a deal by accepting an offer-in-compromise (OIC). In general, an OIC allows you to make a one-time lump sum payment to the IRS that is less than the total amount of the taxes you owe. However, if your tax debt can be fully paid through an installment agreement or by other means, in most cases you may not be eligible for an OIC. Additionally, the amount of tax you propose to pay must reasonably reflect the liability you actually owe to have any success of being accepted by the IRS. You must include a $150 application fee with your OIC request, which is made on Form 656. If the IRS accepts your offer, this amount goes towards reducing your tax liability.

These are only some of the common options available to taxpayers who remain saddled with unpaid tax debt. Each available payment option should be discussed with a tax professional. Our office can help you understand your options and choose a payment method that is best for you, personally and financially. 

If you've made, or are planning to make, a big gift before the end of 2009, you may be wondering what your gift tax liability, if any, may be. You may have to file a federal tax return even if you do not owe any gift tax. Read on to learn more about when to file a federal gift tax return.

When you must file

Most gifts you make are not subject to the gift tax. Generally, you must file a gift tax return, Form 709, U.S. Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, if any of the following apply to gifts you have made, or will make, in 2009:

• Gifts you give to another person (other than your spouse) exceed the $13,000 annual gift tax exclusion for 2009.
• You and your spouse are splitting a gift.
• You gave someone (other than your spouse) a gift of a future interest that he or she cannot actually possess, enjoy or receive income from until some time in the future.

Remember, filing a gift tax return does not necessarily mean you will owe gift tax.

Gifts that do not require a tax return

You do not have to file a gift tax return to report three types of gifts: (1) transfers to political organizations, (2) gift payments that qualify for the educational exclusion, or (3) gift payments that qualify for the medical payment exclusion. Although medical expenses and tuition paid for another person are considered gifts for federal gift tax purposes, if you make the gift directly to the medical or educational institution, the payment will be non-taxable. This applies to any amount you directly transfer to the provider as long as the payments go directly to them, not to the person on whose behalf the gift is made.

Unified credit

Even if the gift tax applies to your gifts, it may be completely eliminated by the unified credit, also referred to as the applicable credit amount, which can eliminate or reduce your gift (as well as estate) taxes. You must subtract the unified credit from any gift tax you owe; any unified credit you use against your gift tax in one year will reduce the amount of the credit you can apply against your gift tax liability in a later year. Keep in mind that the total credit amount that you use against your gift tax liability during your life reduces the credit available to use against your estate tax.

Let's take a look at an example:

In 2009, you give your nephew Ben a cash gift of $8,000. You also pay the $20,000 college tuition of your friend, Sam. You give your 30-year-old daughter, Mary, $25,000. You also give your 27-year-old son, Michael, $25,000. Before 2009, you had never given a taxable gift. You apply the exceptions to the gift tax and the unified credit as follows:

• The qualified education tuition exclusion applies to the gift to Sam, as payment of tuition expenses is not subject to the gift tax. Therefore, the gift to Sam is not a taxable gift.
• The 2009 annual exclusion applies to the first $13,000 of your gift to Ben, Mary and Michael, since the first $13,000 of your gift to any one individual in 2009 is not taxable. Therefore, your $8,000 gift to Ben, the first $13,000 of your gift to Mary, and the first $13,000 of your gift to Michael are not taxable gifts.
• Finally, apply the unified credit. The gift tax will apply to $24,000 of the above transfers ($12,000 remaining from your gift to Mary, plus $12,000 remaining from your gift to Michael). The amount of the tax on the $24,000 is computed using IRS tables for computing the gift tax, which is located in the Instructions for Form 709. You would subtract the tax owe on these gifts from your unified credit of $345,800 for 2009. The unified credit that you can use against the gift tax in a later year (and against any estate tax) will thus be reduced. If you apply the unified credit to the amount of gift tax owe in 2009, you may not have to pay any gift tax for the year. Nevertheless, you will have to file a Form 709.

Filing a gift tax return

You must report the amount of a taxable gift on Form 709. For gifts made in 2009, the maximum gift tax rate is 45 percent. You can make an unlimited number of tax-free gifts in 2009, as long as the gifts are not more than $13,000 to each person or entity in 2009 (or $26,000 if you and your spouse make a gift jointly), without having to pay gift taxes on the transfers.

Falling interest rates and the current slowdown in the U.S. economy are having a widespread affect on today's economy and individuals' financial resources, from savings accounts to personal loans and credit card debt. The drop in interest rates that has occurred over the course of the last few months has also produced strategic tax planning opportunities for individuals contemplating certain types of asset transfers.

Lower interest rates affect the income, estate and gift tax consequences of making certain asset transfers and utilizing various estate planning tools, reducing or eliminating altogether transfer tax costs. On the other hand, low interest rates make some types of transfers and tax planning techniques unappealing. Here are some examples.

Private annuity arrangements

Private annuities, like life estates, term interests, remainders, and reversions are valued for estate, gift and tax purposes using actuarial tables issued under Code Sec. 7520 by the IRS. The applicable interest rate, which the IRS calls the "Applicable Federal Rate" (or AFR), fluctuates based on current market interest rates and is published on a monthly basis by the IRS. For example, the Code Sec. 7520 interest rate for March 2008 was 3.6 percent. The interest rate hit a historical low of 3 percent in July 2003, and has been as high as 11.6 percent.

In a typical private annuity arrangement, a parent transfers assets to his or her child or children in exchange for the transferee's promise to pay a fixed, periodic income payment for the parent's life. To escape gift tax, the value of the annuity payments is based on the IRS's published interest rates and life expectancy schedules. If the fair market value of the assets that are transferred under the arrangement equal the value given to the annuity under the IRS's valuation tables, no gift tax will result from the transaction. The lower the interest rates when the private annuity arrangement is entered into, the lower the annual annuity payments that will have to be made to the parent, resulting in lower, or no, gift tax costs.

Grantor retained annuity trust

A grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT) is an attractive estate-planning tool, especially when interest rates are low. A GRAT is an irrevocable trust in which the grantor transfers assets to the trust but retains the right to receive fixed annuity payments for a specified period of years. When the trust's term expires, the trust terminates and the remaining trust assets are distributed to non-charitable beneficiaries, such as the grantor's children.

The value of the remainder interest in a GRAT is determined according to the IRS's Code Sec. 7520 interest rate; the assumption is that the assets placed in the trust will appreciate at this rate. Therefore, the lower the interest rate in the month that a GRAT is set up, the lower the value of the remainder interest in the trust and therefore the less in gift tax will be paid. A GRAT is especially useful for transferring income-producing assets or property expected to increase in value over the course of the years because all future appreciation not only is removed from the grantor's estate, but appreciation that exceeds the Code Sec. 7520 interest rate passes free of gift tax to the beneficiaries.

Charitable lead annuity trust

A charitable lead annuity trust (CLAT) is like a GRAT, except that the annuity payments are distributed to charities, not the grantor, with the remainder passing to noncharitable beneficiaries, such as children. Gift tax is not due on the value of the charitable interest. A low interest rate in the month that the CLAT is established creates two important benefits: an increase in the present value of the charity's lead interest, which translates into a larger charitable income tax deduction and a lower gift tax on the remainder interest that passes to family members.

Charitable remainder interests in a personal residence

Lower interest rates also produce tax savings for individuals who transfer a remainder interest in their home, but retain a life interest in the property. The individual takes an income tax deduction for the gift of the remainder interest in the home that passes to the charitable organization. As interest rates decrease, the value of the remainder interest and, thus, the charitable deduction increases.

Importantly, low interest rates are not always beneficial in tax planning. Although there are tax benefits to the following planning tools, lower interest rates make these tax planning "techniques" unattractive:

Grantor retained income trusts

A grantor retained income trust (GRIT) operates like a GRAT, except that the grantor retains an income interest in the trust for a specified period instead of an annuity interest. A decrease in interest rates operates to reduce the value of the grantor's retained income interest, thereby increasing the value of the remainder interest to the beneficiaries, and thus increasing the gift tax.

Charitable remainder annuity trusts

A charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) also operates like a GRAT except that the remainder interest in the trust passes to one or more charitable beneficiaries, as opposed to family members. The grantor takes a current income tax deduction for the present value of the charity's remainder interest, therefore the grantor wants the trust's remainder interest to be as large as possible so that he or she can maximize the deduction. The lower the interest rate when the CRAT is established, the lower the value of the remainder interest that passes to charity, and therefore the lower the charitable tax deduction.

Charitable remainder unitrusts

A CRUT is similar to a CRAT - but the grantor receives a fixed percent of the trust's value each year, with the remainder interest passing to charity. And like a CRAT, a change in interest rates will not generally affect the size of the income tax deductions or the gift taxes associated with charitable remainder unitrusts (CRUTs). For example, the value of the charitable interest is calculated based on today's values, and thus a lower interest rate will result in a lower value of the charitable interest and thus a lower current tax deduction.

Qualified personal residence trust

A qualified personal residence trust (QPRT) is similar to a GRAT, except the grantor retains the right to live in the home, instead of receiving annuity payments, with the remainder interest passing to his or her beneficiaries. The lower the interest rate, the larger the remainder interest subject to gift tax, and therefore the larger the transfer tax.

If you would like to talk about the tax benefits and consequences of these or other tax planning tools, please call our office. We would be glad to discuss how these and other strategies fit in to your personal financial and tax situation.